School: Minister Destiny Testimony Schools Track: Adult Class: Certificate Topics — Year 1 (Foundations) · Home: Advocacy Certificate behind this topic: "Creating a Communications Strategy" — LinkedIn Learning, earned by Minister Destiny Marie Morgan (Jun 06, 2025) — earned ×2, including accredited versions (PMI-accredited version) Founded and presented by: Muslim Ordained Minister Destiny Marie Morgan
This lesson is educational information from Minister Destiny Testimony Schools. It teaches the public body of knowledge in this subject — the same ground Minister Destiny studied for her certificate — in this school's own words. It is not the original course, it does not award the original credential, and it is not legal or medical advice. If you are in danger right now, call 911.
Before you start
- This school never asks your name. Your progress is saved only in your own browser on this device — the school collects and keeps nothing. If you pass this unit's quiz (80% or higher, retakes allowed), you earn a downloadable certificate with a blank line — you write your own name on it after you save it. Quiz answers are not shown; if you miss a question, re-read the lesson and try again.
- This unit teaches you to build one complete, small communications strategy — for a cause, a service, or a small organisation — and to defend every tactic in it by pointing to the strategy it serves.
- Minister Destiny earned this certificate twice, including an accredited version, because strategy is what keeps advocacy from becoming noise: many true messages, sent at random, still add up to no change.
The lesson
Part 1. Strategy Before Tactics
A tactic is a single act of communication: a post, a flyer, a press release, a speech. A strategy is the reasoning that chooses among tactics: what change you are trying to make, in whom, by saying what, through which channels, in what order — and how you will know whether it worked. Tactics without strategy feel busy and accomplish little. Strategy without tactics is a wish. The discipline taught in this unit is to write the strategy first, in plain sentences, and then let it approve or reject every tactic proposed afterward.
A useful test: for any tactic, ask "what objective does this serve, for which audience?" If nobody can answer in one sentence, the tactic does not belong in the plan yet. Strategy also protects small teams: two volunteers cannot run six channels well, and a strategy naming two channels, served consistently, will outperform scattered effort. Saying no, on paper and in advance, is one of strategy's main jobs.
Strategy is written down. A strategy that lives only in the leader's head cannot be delegated, tested, or improved, and it dies the first busy week. The document can be short — a few pages for a small organisation — but it must exist, have an owner, and carry a review date.
Part 2. Situation Analysis — Where You Actually Stand
Every honest strategy begins with a situation analysis: a clear-eyed account of where things stand before you communicate anything. It covers the problem or opportunity in plain facts (not hopes), what has been tried before and what happened, what audiences currently believe or misunderstand, what friendly and opposing voices are saying, and what resources — people, time, money, credibility — you truly have. A common structure sorts findings into strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, but the structure matters less than the honesty: a situation analysis written to flatter the organisation produces a strategy built on fog.
Research at this level is mostly listening and reading: review past materials and results, ask audience members what they know and where they get information, and check what partner and opposing organisations publish. Note the gaps between what you assume the audience thinks and what they say — those gaps are where the strategy does its real work.
End the analysis with one or two sentences naming the central challenge, for example: "Parents here trust the school nurse but have never heard of the Saturday clinic, and the only flyer is in a language many do not read." A strategy that cannot state its problem that plainly is not ready for objectives.
Part 3. Audiences — Segments, Not "The General Public"
"The general public" is not an audience; it is everyone, which means no one in particular, and messages aimed at everyone land on no one. Audience segmentation divides the people you need to reach into groups that share something that changes the message: what they need, what they already believe, whom they trust, which language they read, or what action they are able to take. A clinic strategy might segment into current patients, parents who have never visited, local faith leaders who refer families, and the staff who answer the phones — four audiences needing four different messages through four different routes.
For each segment, write what they need to know, what they need to feel or believe, and what specific action you are asking of them. Prioritise: most small strategies name one or two primary audiences, because trying to move everyone at once moves no one. Also name who you are not trying to reach; that sentence saves money and arguments later.
Segmentation is about relevance, not manipulation: the same truth adapted to different starting points, never contradictory things to different audiences. If two segments compared notes, the facts should match; only emphasis, examples, and channel differ.
Part 4. Objectives and the Message House
An objective states the change the communication will produce, in a form that can be checked later. Weak objectives describe activity: "post regularly," "raise awareness" with no measure attached. Strong objectives name audience, change, amount, and time: "By the end of the term, 150 neighbourhood parents will have booked a first clinic visit," or "Local coverage will describe our service accurately, without the outdated claim, in at least three outlets." A practical pattern is to set objectives at three levels: what people will know, what they will believe or feel, and what they will do — with the "do" objective mattering most, because communication that changes nothing anyone does has not finished its job.
The strategy's messages are then organised in a message house. The roof is the single core message — the one sentence every audience should be able to repeat. Beneath it stand a few supporting pillars: the proof points, stories, and facts that make the roof believable, usually three. The foundation is the shared truth the whole house stands on: your purpose and values. The house is a discipline tool. Every release, post, and speech should be traceable to the roof or a pillar; anything that cannot be traced is off-strategy, however clever it sounds. Draft the roof sentence by testing it aloud on someone outside the team: if they cannot repeat it back, it is not yet a core message.
Part 5. Channels, Calendar, and Owners
With audiences, objectives, and messages set, channel selection becomes a practical matching exercise instead of a fashion contest. For each audience, ask where they already pay attention and whom they trust there: a community radio slot may beat a polished video for one segment; a printed notice at a trusted gathering place may beat every social platform for another. Choose few channels and serve them well. For each channel, record the format, the frequency you can honestly sustain, and the person responsible.
The calendar turns the strategy into dated work: launch moments, regular rhythms (weekly post, monthly letter), known external dates to join or avoid, and the review points from Part 6. Every calendar entry gets an owner — a named person, not "the team" — and a deadline that includes time for approval. Build the calendar backwards from the objective's deadline, and leave slack: a calendar with no empty space collapses at the first emergency, which in advocacy work is a normal week, not an exception.
Budget honestly too: some channels cost money, all cost time, and writing the real cost beside each tactic is part of what makes a strategy a management tool instead of a poster.
Part 6. Evaluation — Built In From the Start
Evaluation is not a report written at the end to justify the work; it is designed at the beginning, beside the objectives. For each objective, the strategy states in advance: what will be counted, where that number lives, who collects it, and when it will be reviewed. If an objective says 150 first visits, the plan names the booking record as the source and the monthly review as the moment someone compares the count against the target and decides what to adjust.
Measure outcomes before outputs. Outputs are what you produced — posts published, flyers distributed. Outcomes are what changed — visits booked, accurate stories published, sign-ups completed. Outputs still matter as a check that the plan was actually carried out, but a strategy review that only counts outputs will congratulate a failing campaign. Schedule at least one mid-course review with permission to change tactics: channels that are not reaching their audience get dropped or fixed, messages that confuse get rewritten, and the strategy document itself is updated so the next planner inherits what you learned.
Close the strategy's life with a short final review: objectives versus results, what worked, what did not, and what you would do differently. That page, honestly written, is the most valuable thing this strategy leaves behind.
Words to know — Creating a Communications Strategy
- Strategy — the written reasoning that decides what change to make, in whom, with what messages and channels, and how success will be known.
- Tactic — a single act of communication, such as a post, flyer, release, or speech, chosen because it serves the strategy.
- Situation analysis — the honest opening account of the problem, past efforts, audience beliefs, and real resources.
- Audience segmentation — dividing audiences into groups whose needs or trusted channels differ enough to change the message.
- Objective — a checkable statement of change: audience, change, amount, time.
- Message house — one core message as roof, proof points as pillars, purpose and values as foundation.
- Channel — a route by which a message reaches an audience: radio, a noticeboard, a platform, a meeting.
- Owner — the named person responsible for a calendar item or channel and its deadline.
- Outputs and outcomes — outputs are what you produced; outcomes are what changed. Strategy is judged on outcomes.
- Evaluation — pre-planned counting and review comparing results with objectives.
Myths vs facts — Creating a Communications Strategy
- Myth: Strategy is paperwork that slows down the real work of posting and publishing. Fact: The written strategy is what lets a small team reject off-purpose tactics, delegate safely, and know whether any of the busywork worked.
- Myth: A good strategy targets the general public. Fact: Effective strategies name specific segments with specific actions. Messages aimed at everyone land on no one.
- Myth: "Raise awareness" is a complete objective. Fact: Without an audience, a measurable change, and a date, awareness cannot be checked. Strong objectives say who will know, believe, or do what, by when.
- Myth: More channels always means more reach. Fact: Two channels served consistently beat six served badly. Channel choice follows the audience, not fashion.
- Myth: Evaluation happens at the end if there is time. Fact: Measures, sources, and review dates are written into the strategy at the start, with a mid-course review empowered to change tactics.
Think it through — Creating a Communications Strategy
A tenants' association wants more residents at its monthly advice evenings. The current plan is "post more on social media." Attendance is twelve people, mostly the same twelve, while the building's noticeboard — read daily by hundreds — carries no notice at all, and the evenings are never mentioned at the Friday community lunch where new residents gather.
Walk it through: (1) Situation analysis (Part 2): the problem is not effort but placement — promotion runs where non-attenders are not, and never where they are. (2) Segmentation (Part 3): primary audience is residents who have never attended; a secondary audience is lunch regulars who could invite neighbours personally. (3) Objective (Part 4): not "raise awareness" but "40 first-time attendees across the next three evenings," with a know-believe-do ladder beneath it. (4) Message house (Part 4): roof — "Bring your letter; leave with a plan"; pillars — free, confidential, neighbours who have used it. (5) Channels and calendar (Part 5): noticeboard notice owned by a named volunteer, a two-minute announcement at Friday lunch, social posts kept but demoted — with bookings counted at the door (Part 6) and a review after the second evening with permission to drop what is not working.
Try this — Creating a Communications Strategy
- ☐ Write the one-sentence problem your strategy must solve, naming who is affected and what they currently believe or miss
- ☐ List your audience segments and the single action each one is being asked to take
- ☐ Rewrite one vague objective ("raise awareness") into a checkable one with audience, change, amount, and date
- ☐ Build a message house: one roof sentence, three pillars, one foundation line — and test the roof aloud on someone outside the team
- ☐ For each tactic on your current list, write the objective it serves — and set aside any tactic with no answer
Resources to keep — Creating a Communications Strategy
- Public Relations Society of America (prsa.org) — professional body with strategy, ethics, and planning resources, including its Code of Ethics.
- Institute for Public Relations (instituteforpr.org) — free research library, including measurement and evaluation guidance for building evaluation in from the start.
- Page — Arthur W. Page Society (page.org) — leadership communication principles and case studies on strategy at organisational level, published openly.
- HubSpot Academy (academy.hubspot.com) — free courses on content and communications planning for small teams building calendars and channels.
What you earned / what's next — Creating a Communications Strategy
✅ Creating a Communications Strategy complete (quiz score 80% or higher): You can write a complete small communications strategy — situation, segments, measurable objectives, a message house, matched channels with owners and a calendar, and evaluation designed in from the start — and use it to accept or reject any tactic.
Your certificate
Minister Destiny Testimony Schools Certificate of Completion — Creating a Communications Strategy
This certificate is presented by Muslim Ordained Minister Destiny Marie Morgan
Awarded to: ______________________________ (write your name here after you download — your name is never collected or stored by this school)
Date completed: ______________
You have learned to decide before you speak — to aim true words at the people who need them and to check whether they landed. That is how a small voice moves a community. — Minister Destiny Marie Morgan
This is a certificate of educational completion from Minister Destiny Testimony Schools. It is not a state license, a government certification, or the original course credential.
What's next: Return to the Certificate Topics for your next Year 1 Foundations topic.
Sources
- Code of Ethics and planning resources — Public Relations Society of America (prsa.org) — used for professional standards and the role of strategy in ethical practice.
- Communicator's Guide to Research, Analysis, and Evaluation — Institute for Public Relations (instituteforpr.org) — used for situation analysis and building evaluation in from the start.
- Page Principles and case studies — Page, Arthur W. Page Society (page.org) — used for organisational communication strategy and leadership context.
- Content and communications planning courses — HubSpot Academy (academy.hubspot.com) — used for small-team calendar and channel practice at orientation level.
Your Progress — On Your Device Only — Creating a Communications Strategy
- Learning outcomes: On completing this unit, the student can:
- explain the difference between strategy and tactics and test any tactic against the strategy
- write a situation analysis that ends in a plain statement of the central challenge
- segment audiences and state the action each segment is being asked to take
- write measurable objectives using a know–believe–do structure
- build a message house with a repeatable core message and supporting proof points
- match channels to audiences, assign owners, and design evaluation in from the start
- Study time: Approximately 1.5 hours — an estimate covering reading, activities, and the test. Students move at their own pace.
- Assessment: A 10-question test drawn only from this unit's lesson. 80% or higher passes and earns the unit certificate. Answers are not shown; your score is saved only in your own browser on this device, and retakes are allowed.
- Level: Certificate Topics — Year 1 (Foundations) · Adult school · working rank on completion path: Freshman → Sophomore.
- Version: Version 1.0 — October 2026.
Minister Destiny Testimony Schools — Adult. Educational information only. Help lines: 911 for emergencies · 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (call/text 988).